• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

CDC whistleblower on MMR fraud reveals his identity

Valentijn

Senior Member
Messages
15,786

ahmo

Senior Member
Messages
4,805
Location
Northcoast NSW, Australia
I only learned of Sayer Ji, who's written for Mercola, from the recent Detox Summit. I signed up to his weekly digests, and received one dealing w/ this issue today. There's a linked interview of Ji on Renses' Infowars. Rense is pretty controversial, I don't have an opinion on him, have only seen a bit of his stuff a few years ago. But Sayer Ji seems pretty reliable, from the little I've seen. I'm posting a piece from an earlier article of his, Aug 27, also linked in today's piece.

ETA: one of the commenters on Ji's article asks why he'd appear on Rense, describes Rense as a Disinfo peddler. that may well be true.

http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/infowars...-als-ice-washing-cdc-vaccine-gate-start-1545/

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdc-autismvaccine-coverup-extends-media-and-journals
The CDC, the mainstream media and scientific journals are participating in what may be the most heinous and far-reaching medical cover up of our time.

The long running controversy over the role of vaccines in the steadily expanding autism epidemic – which the CDC says affects 1 in every 68 U.S. children – continues to bubble to the surface. With the recent publication of a study revealing African-American boys receiving their first MMR vaccine before 36 months of age are 3.4 times more likely to develop autism vs. after 36 months, and the confessions of William Thompson, a senior CDC scientist turned whistleblower, who revealed that his own agency covered up the autism-vaccine link in African-American boys over at least the past decade, we may be witnessing the long suppressed emergence of the truth about vaccine-induced brain damage.

But powerful forces are at play here, and only hours ago, it was was revealed that the journal that published the highly concerning MMR/autism study -- Translational Neurodegeneration -- removed it suddenly from their website, with the following explanation:

"This article has been removed from the public domain because of serious concerns about the validity of its conclusions. The journal and publisher believe that its continued availability may not be in the public interest. Definitive editorial action will be pending further investigation."

One would assume stories of this magnitude -- with direct health implications to millions of U.S. children -- would make national headlines, or that there would at least be critical responses and/or denials in major news outlets or by public and private health organizations whose responsibility it is to respond to these concerns and/or allegations. To the contrary, what we are witnessing is an eerie and highly conspicuous silence surrounding Thompson's revelations, who has been called a "medical Edward Snowden," in acknowledgment of how devastating and unrecoverable these charges are to the CDC's credibility, and by implication, it's entire ever-expanding one-size-fits-all immunization schedule.

Only a single user-generated Ireport exists on CNN's website documenting the original allegations, which CNN took down and then reinstated only after realizing (we believe) such an unprincipled move only confirmed the growing suspicion of a widely coordinated media cover-up. The mainstream media's near absolute silence on the topic is at least internally consistent, as it reflects their decades long culpability in the near universal support for the CDC and vaccine manufacturers' denial of the harm done through their policies and products and their widespread characterization of dissenters a "dangerous" or even, as Bill Gates once said in interview, are responsible for 'Killing Children.'

The truth, spoken plainly, is that autism is a form of brain damage, resulting from an ever increasing repertoire of environmental exposures, which include vaccines, chemicals, drugs, food additives, pollution, infectious agents in the post-antibiotic era, incompatible dietary components, etc. While there are genetic and epigenetic susceptibility factors that mediate the risk for brain damage, autism and/or autism spectrum disorder itself is not some mysterious 'genetic epidemic' – a highly oxymoronic concept - organizations like the CDC constantly pay lip service to because it effectively 'blames the victim' or the victim's family's genes, distracting from the vaccine-associated iatrogenesis that is a primary driver of this epidemic. Of course, no single exposure or vaccine, in most cases, can be identified as 'the cause,' as no effect in the universe – and certainly not one occurring in highly complex biological systems - is produced through a singular force of action or exposure. This makes the argument that 'you can't prove any vaccine caused autism' technically true. However, the absence of proof does not mean something that is isn't. The truth is the truth, no matter how determined the CDC, the media or journals are to hide or ignore it....
 
Last edited:

cigana

Senior Member
Messages
1,095
Location
UK
It's very odd to remove a paper simply because it might be discredited, prior to that discrediting actually happening. But I think the only thing it proves is that professionals and institutions are terrified of being labeled as "anti-vax".
Very odd indeed. Not science.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
Looks like the journal has pulled Hooker's paper:
http://www.autismdailynewscast.com/...udy-of-autism-and-mmr-vaccine/15168/joworgan/
If this is true it's really worrying.

Maybe. But its also normal. If serious questions have been asked that need to be investigated, a paper may be pulled for a while. It all depends on the quality of investigation. If its the usual pathetic investigating, then yes its a concern. If its highly biased investigation, then its a concern. If its about something specific that invalidates the study, then its entirely appropriate.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia

National Vaccine Information Center Calls for Removal of Vaccine Safety Oversight from Department of Health and Human Services



By Barbara Loe Fisher

The non-profit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is renewing its call for oversight of vaccine safety to be removed from the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), which is responsible for vaccine development, regulation, policymaking, and promotion and also serves as a legal respondent and administrator for the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).1

NVIC’s call comes after a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a public statement2 on Aug. 27, 2014 admitting he and CDC co-authors of a MMR vaccine safety study3 published in 2004 in Pediatrics “omitted statistically significant information” and that “the final study protocol was not followed.”
 

natasa778

Senior Member
Messages
1,774
Parents are finding their voice - this story has sparked a campaign that has grown organically and has now gone viral.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/933954-autism-parents-reply-to-cnn-hear-this-well/?photo=3


"People started to say, ‘Can we also make videos?’ And I said yeah, that’s a great idea.” It quickly snowballed into a catalyzing event for this extremely pained community.

Mothers, father, grandmothers, grandfathers, children, siblings, and even unaffected people began recording videos ranging from 10 seconds to a minute and a half, telling very short versions of their stories ...

Each story is unique, yet with a deeply troubling thread that stays consistent


iulgn58pp4bmf07yx2jk5vxqwp-b.jpg
 
Last edited:

golden

Senior Member
Messages
1,831
“There are more whistleblowers coming out. We know who they are and we’ve spoken to them. They’re petrified, but if they come out together … the CDC can’t cover up all the whistleblowers.”

I hope they find the courage and strength to come out.

I hope they can be supported and helped in disclosing the truth. They can at least Absolve their futures.