I thought the tiff between Goldacre and the journo was interesting, especially the bit where the journo admitted that he was basically parroting what he'd read, and that it wasn't economically feasible to have experts commenting on health issues.
I was a bit surprised that Goldacre referred to 'Chronic fatigue extremists' - not very scientific language for someone who prides himself on the same. I would like to know what qualifies them as extremists - are they extremely ill, for instance, or are they people who were extremely angry about not actually being ill?
I was a bit surprised that Goldacre referred to 'Chronic fatigue extremists' - not very scientific language for someone who prides himself on the same. I would like to know what qualifies them as extremists - are they extremely ill, for instance, or are they people who were extremely angry about not actually being ill?